
Three years ago, the Authors Guild, the Association of American Publishers and a handful of authors and publishers filed a class action lawsuit against Google Book Search. After that Google settled that lawsuit and now working closely with these industry partners to bring even more of the world's books online
Recently revised Google Book Search settlement so what it means for readers. Let's understand how exactly the settlement will help expand access to books.
Until now, Google only show few snippets of text for most of the in-copyright books to users that scanned through
Library Project. Since the vast majority of these books are out of print, to actually read them you have to hunt them down at a library or a used bookstore. And if you can't find them because the only known copy is at a library on the other side of the country so you're unfortunately out of luck.
Three types of books will available in Google Book Search.
-
In-copyright and in-print books
In-print books are books that publishers are still actively selling, the ones you see at most bookstores. This agreement expands the online marketplace for in-print books by letting authors and publishers turn on the "preview" and "purchase" models that make their titles more easily available through Book Search.
In-copyright but out-of-print books
Out-of-print books aren’t actively being published or sold, so the only way to procure one is to track it down in a library or used bookstore. When this agreement is approved, every out-of-print book that we digitize will become available online for preview and purchase, unless its author or publisher chooses to "turn off" that title. it will be a tremendous boon to the publishing industry to enable authors and publishers to earn money from volumes they might have thought were gone forever from the marketplace.
-
Out-of-copyright books
This agreement doesn't affect how Google display out-of-copyright books; Google will continue to allow Book Search users to read, download and print these titles, just as we do today.
Google Book Search
settlement agreement will expand access to books for readers in the United States
- When you find the book you're searching for, you’ll be able to preview 20% of the book over the Internet from anywhere in the U.S. If you want to look at the whole thing, you'll be able to go down to your public library where there will be a computer station with access to the whole book for free. And if you don’t want to leave home or want a copy for yourself, you’ll be able to purchase access to an electronic copy of the book. As always, if the book is old enough to be in the public domain, you’ll be able to download the whole book for free.
- If you’re at a university, in addition to your libraries' free access points, your school can obtain an institutional subscription that gives you access to most books that we've scanned. And scholars and students who don’t keep the same study hours as the library will be able to look at any book, anywhere, any time.
- If you are vision impaired, the settlement will open a world of books to which you've never had access. Visually impaired people will be able to search for books through the Google Books interface and purchase, borrow, or read at a public library any of the books that are available to the general public in a format that is accessible to the vision impaired.
- If you want to read in foreign languages, you will have access to tens of thousands of more books than you have today. Books in Spanish add up to almost 10% of the books already scanned. If you account for the difference in numbers between books in Spanish and English, the usage per book in Spanish is more than three times what it is for books in English.
The settlement won't just expand access to out-of-print books, either. Because authors and publishers will have the ability to let users preview and purchase their in-print books through Google Book Search, readers will have even more options for accessing in-print books than they have today.
For users outside the U.S., the Google Book Search experience won't change unless rightsholders specifically authorize additional uses of their books outside the United States. And while the Google Book Search settlement will only allow for improved access in the U.S
Google also create
The Book Rights Registry which represent authors, publishers and other rightsholders. In essence, the Registry will help locate rightsholders and ensure that they receive the money their works earn under this agreement. Authors and publishers finy any book or matirial that belogs to them then thay should visit the
settlement Notice website & clain the book or authors, publishers can sign up for, the Partner Program
here.

Recently web site TechCrunch is reporting that Last.fm is going beyond sharing aggregated statistics and into the realm of sharing individual user information. According to TechCrunch, Last.fm had given the RIAA a list of its users and their IP addresses that. Last.fm handed data to the
RIAA so they could track who’s been listening to the “leaked” U2 album.
Second time Techcrunch reported that RIAA had the data but not from last.fm but it's parental company CBS Interactive & even Last.fm didn't know about this data sharing. Well Last.fm
denied the allegations, both time.
When first time TechCrunch accused
last.fm for data sharing , that time Last.fm founder
Richard Jones post a blogpost on their blog "
Techcrunch are full of shit". May be TechCrunch article came across as some sort of sordid publicity stunt. That time RIAA didn't know that from where the rumor come from. lately RIAA denies rumors that Last.fm turned over user data
Last.fm staff member
Russ Garrett also
posted in a discussion threadI'd like to issue a full and categorical denial of this. We've never had any request for such data by anyone, and if we did we wouldn't consent to it.
Of course we work with the major labels and provide them with broad statistics, as we would with any other label, but we'd never personally identify our users to a third party - that goes against everything we stand for.
As far as I'm concerned Techcrunch have made this whole story up.
When second time Techcrunch saying that data has been handover to RIAA but not via last.fm but via its parent company, CBS Corp. This time also last.fm denied the
allegations that CBS handed over USER DATA RIAA also said on Monday “We’ve made no such request for this information,”
but here it was important what CBS has to say about this allegations & Now CBS responds:
Both CBS and the RIAA have already stated quite clearly, for the record, that absolutely no individual user or listener information was supplied to the RIAA by Last.fm or any division of CBS Corporation in the past, nor do we plan to do so in the future. The story posted by the Web site was based on an unnamed tipster. No inquiry was made to CBS or Last.fm about the veracity of the anonymous source. Those who consult such blogs should be aware of the standard by which such postings are sourced and published.
Well, Who knows who is right & who is wrong but story making should come from facts & CBS is right about this "
Those who consult such blogs should be aware of the standard by which such postings are sourced and published." Media has power & it's very good when its on side of good & some says "Pen having a more power then guns these days." It is a good medium but it's bad when it turn in Evil. Surly this
allegations will hurt badly to last.fm brand image and I see many users closing their accounts.

Recently Digg made some changes for
sharing its content and now some changes also come up with licensing. All of the content on Digg which people post has been licensed as public domain until now. Comments, story titles, story descriptions, and all of the other user-contributed content on the Digg site are explicitly put into the public domain so that others can do great things with them. For sure this is good for the internet and good for society. good for all.

As of today, Digg have taken that one step further by upgrading the public domain license to the Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license. The CC0 license expresses that content posted on Digg is public domain even internationally. Previous public domain license was only clear within the USA.
To reflect this change, Digg also updated the Terms of Use agreement.
"By creating and posting Content to Digg, you warrant that you own all rights to the Content, agree that the Content will be dedicated to the public domain under the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication, available at http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ and that you will not object to the use of the Content by Digg in any context. To clarify, the above does not apply to the Content on external sites linked to by the original submission."
See Section #6 of the TOU Digg also updated the footer notice.
It's a minor point maybe, but it reflects good intentions of Digg, with new license its more flexible and easy for user to contributed content without any restriction. Good to go Digg